Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) @ EPFL
Human-centered technology research at EPFL spans a range of areas, including human-AI interaction, security & privacy, education, health, development, safe & responsible AI, participatory AI, robotics, design, digital humanities, assistive technologies, and more.
Explore our research labs & centers, courses, PhD programs, and community events.
From Virtual Patients to Design Principles: Advancing Human–Agent Interaction in Sensitive Domains
Haiyi Zhu, Associate Professor, Carnegie Mellon University
As the use of generative AI and agentic systems expands into sensitive domains such as mental health, a key challenge is designing agents that interact with humans in ways that are effective, beneficial, and safe, while also uncovering generalizable principles of human–agent interaction. In this talk, I will first present our work, sponsored by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), on designing virtual patient agents and automated feedback systems to support experiential training for mental health providers. We develop a safe, practice-oriented environment in which volunteer counselors and early-stage professionals can build skills without risk to real clients. Our Virtual Patient Agents are grounded in psychotherapy theory and informed by the analysis of 2,000 hours of psychotherapy transcripts, enabling realistic and adaptive patient simulations. We also introduce LLM-based assessments of core psychotherapy constructs, supported by theory-driven measurement frameworks and validated through studies with 27 trained annotators, demonstrating high agreement with human ratings. Building on these efforts, I conclude by synthesizing insights from our work and a broader literature review to identify key principles for designing effective, trustworthy, and adaptive human–agent interactions.
Time: Friday, November 6, 10:30-11:30
Location: BC 420, EPFL
Perspectives on AI: Human-AI (Knowledge) Alignment
IDIAP
What does it mean for a person and an AI system to be “aligned”?
Existing work tends to treat alignment as a one-way task: either aligning AI systems with human values, goals and preferences pre- deployment, or helping people adapt to the capabilities and limits of these systems.
In this event, we want to explore a different view: alignment as a bidirectional and continuous process that takes place during interaction. Humans and AI systems each hold knowledge the other lacks. Aligning them means disclosing, soliciting and building that knowledge over time.
Through talks, discussions and interactive activities, we will discuss and critically examine what this view means for research and for the design of AI systems. The day is organised jointly by Idiap and VU Amsterdam. Researchers, students and anyone interested in how humans and AI understand each other are welcome. We look forward to seeing you!
Time: Friday, November 13, 09:15-17:30
Location: Idiap Research Institute, Rue Marconi 19, 1920 Martigny, Switzerland
(Un)rigorous AI
Alexandra Olteanu, Researcher, MILA
Beliefs and assumptions about what AI systems can, will, or should do abound. Although often unsupported and sometimes highly questionable, these beliefs and assumptions have had a formative impact on how AI systems are built, evaluated and described. This in turn impacts how and in what settings these systems are deployed and used, and thus when they fail. However, foreseeing and addressing the consequences of putting insufficiently rigorous AI artifacts (e.g., models, systems, applications, outputs, data) into practice are often seen as the purview of responsible AI—which is generally seen as separate from rigor, as it is understood as more concerned with ethics, stakeholders, societal impacts and harms, and real-world deployment scenarios. I argue that what responsible AI asks researchers and practitioners is to uphold principles of scientific integrity in their work. Although responsible AI is often seen as out of scope for an AI researcher or practitioner not engaged in that space, any scientist and practitioner should see rigor as well within scope. In this talk, my goal is to provide a useful framework for broadening our collective understanding of what rigorous AI research and practice should entail and, in doing so, to help scaffold much-needed dialogue about and scrutiny of current AI system development and evaluation practices.
Time: Thursday, November 19, 13:30-14:30
Location: EPFL AI Center
https://memento.epfl.ch/event/ai-center-seminar-ai-for-society-series-dr-alexand/